https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Category_talk%3AGuides 2026-10-17T03:46:52Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.35.2 https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?title=Category_talk:Guides&diff=62179&oldid=prev 2009-07-19T10:49:35Z

<p>Protected &quot;<a href="/index.php?title=Category_talk:Guides" title="Category talk:Guides">Category talk:Guides</a>&quot; [edit=sysop:move=sysop]</p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface"> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:49, 19 July 2009</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

ingenting https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?title=Category_talk:Guides&diff=62178&oldid=prev 2009-07-19T10:49:35Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Should we have guidelines for guides?</span></span></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Should we have guidelines for guides? ==<br /> <br /> There are many ways to write a guide, but what style do we want for this wiki? I have long considered rewriting my Ship Probing guide and this is the perfect oppertonity. Now I have 2 very different versions of this guide, the one that is here right now which is a copy of the one I did for EON [[Ship Probing]] and there is the one I did on the forums [http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&amp;threadID=431586|A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations].<br /> The EON guide is is written to be an interesting read even if you don't scan probe and is a real newbie guide while the forum guide assumes a bit more knowledge of EVE and focus heavily on the more advanced stuff like the behind the scences and how that effects probing in practice.<br /> So which one should I base my new guide on? Or should it perhaps be completely different from both of them? Do we have any guidelines on how the guides here should look like? --[[Contributor name:Hoshi|Hoshi]] 08:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br /> <br /> Possibly a specific format with mandatory and voluntary headlines would be nice. As for which of your guides, Hoshi, to use, I suspect the field's divided there if you ask for community input. A short and condensed version would be best for in-game use, while a more verbose text is, as you allude to, best for the beginner. Perhaps the Powers That Be have an opinion. --[[Contributor name:Shaun Livingstone|Shaun Livingstone]] 08:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)<br /> <br /> IMO it should focus more on the beginners, but a section for the more experienced isn't a bad idea. --[[Contributor name:ingenting|ingenting]] 10:49, 19 July 2009 (GMT)<br /> <br /> == Missing guides ==<br /> [[Apocrypha Probing ]] --[[Contributor name:Altaree|Altaree]] 14:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)</div>

ingenting