https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ATanking 2026-10-17T13:41:01Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.35.2 https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?title=Talk:Tanking&diff=42040&oldid=prev 2009-02-04T02:58:02Z

<p>Protected &quot;<a href="/index.php?title=Talk:Tanking" title="Talk:Tanking">Talk:Tanking</a>&quot; [edit=sysop:move=sysop]</p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface"> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 02:58, 4 February 2009</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

keepiru https://wiki.everp.online/index.php?title=Talk:Tanking&diff=42039&oldid=prev 2009-02-04T02:58:02Z

<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Definition of active and passive tanking</span></span></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>==rewrite==<br /> I rewrote this article because it's previous incarnation was quite tedious and had no real structure (no pun intended). I think it has had bits tacked on here and there, so the article feels quite piecemeal. The article also only had two sections dealing with shield tanking and armour tanking. I don't like theis because there are a lot of common ideas for shield and armour tanking so these two article duplicate that information. The article also goes into too much detail about the specifics of modules. This also makes it hard to read.&lt;br&gt;<br /> The new article has sections for shield/armour/hull tanking (to discuss the differences), hit point buffers, active tanking, passive tanking, and meta tanking. I think this is a more appropriate structure as it allows the merits of each philosophy to be discussed disctinctly and clearly. It should also keep the article more managable in future. [[Contributor name:Sandy Brown|Sandy Brown]] 15:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)<br /> <br /> == Definition of active and passive tanking ==<br /> <br /> Could be I've picked it up wrongly, but I thought the primary difference between active and passive tanking was whether or not the tank relied on capacitor power? The article seems, at the moment, to indicate that passive tanking is always shield tanking.&lt;br /&gt;--[[Contributor name:Damith d'Estelas|Damith d&amp;#39;Estelas]] 02:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> :It is a bit ambiguous. I suspect that there is no standard definition of the term. Different people will probably give lots of different answers. [[Contributor name:Sandy Brown|Sandy Brown]] 01:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)<br /> <br /> :Rather, while passive tanking in general refers to not using active hp regeneration modules, passive armour and shield tanking are different because a passive armour tank is always a buffer tank, while a passive shield tank can achieve considerable hp/sec values. Disambiguation in main article p'rhaps? --[[Contributor name:keepiru|keepiru]] 02:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)</div>

keepiru